The Deadliest Catch Edition

Colin here. There's something absurd about watching Deadliest Catch at 35,000 feet while flying over the very waters where these crab fishermen risk their lives. I discovered this during countless JAL and Cathay flights to Asia, scrolling through seatback entertainment options and invariably landing on episodes of men hauling king crab from the Bering Sea, the same stretch of ocean now spread out in the darkness below.

The show became my unlikely travel companion because it asked nothing of me while delivering everything I needed from airplane television. Drop into any episode mid-stream and the stakes are immediately clear: a greenhorn is either puking over the rail, getting into a scrap on the deck, or about to get crushed by a swinging crab pot, Captain Sig is barking orders through radio static, and somewhere in those black waters, someone is making a decision that could cost them everything. The formula never changed, which is the magic.

Why is this interesting?

Deadliest Catch premiered in 2005 and has now outlasted the entire traditional television ecosystem it was born into. While streaming services have cannibalized cable and reality TV has evolved into home reno and influencer content, this show about working-class fishermen grinding through brutal conditions remains virtually unchanged since the George W. Bush administration. That kind of television longevity is almost unheard of and worth examining.

The secret isn't just the inherent drama of crab fishing, though watching someone nearly die for a few hundred dollars' worth of shellfish does tap into something. It's the show's commitment to a specific type of authenticity that most reality TV shows abandoned years ago. These aren't actors playing fishermen; they're fishermen who happen to be on television. When Captain Phil Harris died of a stroke in 2010, the grief was real. When the Northwestern's engine room caught fire, or when boats go missing in storms, the stakes weren't manufactured for drama: they were simply documented.

The show mines genuine tension from pure repetition. Every season follows an identical structure: boats leave port, captains make calculated gambles about where to drop their pots, weather threatens everything, someone gets hurt, and quotas are either met or missed. Yet within this rigid framework, human nature serves up endless variations, including the constant parade of greenhorns discovering that fifteen dollars an hour isn't worth hypothermia.

More importantly, Deadliest Catch has become an accidental preservation of a particular vision of American work. In an era when reality television celebrates wealth, aspiration, and personal brands, this show has always been about people doing dangerous jobs for middle-class money. There's something both nostalgic and essential about television that celebrates labor rather than lifestyle, especially as the kind of physical, high-stakes work depicted on the show becomes increasingly rare in American life.

Flying over the Bering Sea while watching men work those same waters created an odd doubling effect—the mediated experience layered over the physical reality thousands of feet below. But maybe that's what made the show perfect airplane television: it offered the comfort of the familiar while gently reminding you that somewhere down there, people were still doing tough work in dangerous conditions. (CJN)

McKinsey and Ride AI want to hear from you!

Are you an AV industry insider, academic, or working in media? How do you think the robotaxi industry is doing? Where do you think autonomy will be in the next 10 years? Ride AI has partnered with McKinsey for a webinar series, and we want to hear your thoughts! Take our survey below and get a 25% discount for the 2026 Ride AI conference. It takes less than 10 minutes, and results will be shared with all participants.

https://www.rideai.org/mckinseyavsurvey